Luettavissa myös suomeksi.
The European Union regulation limiting the naming of plant-based food products (article in Finnish) now allows veggie burger and similar names, but will nevertheless ban the use of many terms that traditionally refer to meat products in reference to plant-based food.
As a linguist, the idea of banning particular food product names is totally absurd. Language is constantly changing, and you cannot assume that as word which means one things today will not also refer to something else a few years from now.
Let's use an everyday item as an example: nowadays the object people call a phone only distantly resembles what was referred to by that name only 25 years ago. Although every step of that word's development can be identified and explained, it would be pointless to claim that the broadening of the group of items referred to by that word might have actually confused anyone. The fact that many young people no longer recognize a landline phone is due to the fact that they have largely disappeared from modern homes, not anything related to how people use languageg.
In addition, the word meat can in everyday language refer also to e.g. the soft, interior part of a fruit or coconut, which is neither part of the peel/shell or the pit. People have also talked about coconut milk for years, and wing can also refer to part of a building. All of these usages are typical in both English and Finnish.
The ultimate compromise solution is much better than what it might have been, but there is no sense in banning any sort of name for plant-based food products at all. As long as the packaging makes it clear what the product is made of, there is no reason why a plant-based product could not be called wings.
And I do not believe for second that similar legislation would have even been considered, if manufacturers started calling meat products leaves. Nobody seems to have a problem with chicken salad, after all.